Is TLS 1.2 Deprecated? Key Difference from TLS 1.3

It’s a question many IT professionals, compliance officers, and even developers are asking in 2025, and for good reason. With rapid updates in cybersecurity standards, cryptographic protocols that were once considered secure are now being pushed toward retirement. 

TLS 1.2, once the gold standard for encrypted communication across the internet, is facing increasing scrutiny and partial deprecation.

So, is TLS 1.2 deprecated? Is it still secure? Who is deprecating it, and when? And more importantly, what do you need to do about it?

In this guide, we’ll break it all down. From the history of TLS 1.2 to its known vulnerabilities and the official end-of-life (EOL) timelines from Microsoft Azure, Chrome, and NIST, you’ll get a clear picture of what’s really happening and what steps to take next.

If you’re ready to take the next step in your tech career journey, cybersecurity is the simplest and high-paying field to start from. Apart from earning 6-figures from the comfort of your home, you don’t need to have a degree or IT background. Schedule a one-on-one consultation session with our expert cybersecurity coach, Tolulope Michael TODAY! Join over 1000 students in sharing your success stories.

TLS 1.2 vs TLS 1.3

Feature / Criteria	TLS 1.2	TLS 1.3
Release Year	2008	2018
Current Status	Supported but being phased out	Actively supported and recommended
Deprecation Risk	Medium – likely to be deprecated soon	Low – latest standard
Default in Modern Browsers	Yes (but TLS 1.3 is preferred)	Yes
Support in Microsoft Azure	Supported with strict requirements	Being rolled out across services
NIST Recommendation	Use with strong cipher suites only	Preferred standard
Security Strength	Moderate (depends on config)	High (modern encryption only)
Vulnerabilities	Susceptible to downgrade attacks, weak ciphers	No known practical vulnerabilities (as of now)
Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS)	Optional	Mandatory
Handshake Speed	2 round trips (slower)	1 round trip (faster)
Zero Round Trip (0-RTT)	Not supported	Supported
Cipher Suite Complexity	Complex and includes outdated options	Simplified and secure only
Compliance Risk	High (if using legacy settings)	Low
Recommendation	Migrate away gradually	Adopt wherever possible

RELATED ARTICLE: Cryptography Vs Cybersecurity: Importance of Data Security

What Is TLS 1.2 and Why Was It Important?

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is the cryptographic protocol that ensures your data remains private and secure as it travels across the internet. TLS 1.2, introduced in 2008, became the dominant protocol for securing everything from banking transactions to enterprise logins, email services, and cloud platforms like Microsoft 365 and Azure.

It offered significant improvements over its predecessors, TLS 1.0 and 1.1, including support for stronger encryption algorithms, better certificate validation, and the introduction of features like authenticated encryption. For more than a decade, TLS 1.2 was the trusted foundation of secure web communication.

So, is TLS 1.2 secure? Yes, but only when configured correctly. The issue isn’t that TLS 1.2 itself is fundamentally broken. The problem lies in its flexibility. It allows outdated cipher suites and insecure key exchange methods like RSA and SHA-1, which open the door to vulnerabilities and downgrade attacks. As a result, relying on default or legacy configurations could lead to serious security gaps.

Over time, cybersecurity standards evolved, and TLS 1.3 was released to close those gaps. But the legacy of TLS 1.2, its wide adoption and backward compatibility, has kept it alive longer than most protocols in modern IT environments.

So, Is TLS 1.2 Deprecated or Not?

The short answer is not entirely. But it’s getting there.

TLS 1.2 is not universally deprecated yet, but many organizations and industry leaders are phasing it out or recommending limited use. It still works, and in many systems, it’s still the default. However, its usage is being discouraged in favor of TLS 1.3, which offers improved performance and stronger security by design.

Here’s what’s happening:

• Microsoft Azure and Microsoft Entra ID have already ended support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1, and while TLS 1.2 remains supported, Microsoft is actively rolling out TLS 1.3 for all its endpoints. TLS 1.2 continues to be permitted, but only with strong cipher suites and updated infrastructure.
  
• Google Chrome has deprecated support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1. Although it still allows TLS 1.2, its future depends on continued compliance with updated security standards. This aligns with the broader trend of TLS 1.2 end-of-life in Chrome and other browsers.
  
• NIST, the U.S. federal security authority, does not list TLS 1.2 as deprecated in its SP 800-52 Rev. 2 but recommends strict configurations. The standard emphasizes that only strong cipher suites should be used and that TLS 1.3 is the preferred protocol moving forward. A TLS 1.2 end of life NIST recommendation could come in future revisions.

So while TLS 1.2 is not yet obsolete, it is clearly on a countdown clock. Systems and applications that continue to rely on it, especially with weak configurations, risk security flaws, compliance failures, and loss of compatibility down the line.

READ MORE: Can Vulnerability Scanning Ensure NIS2 Compliance?

TLS 1.2 End-of-Life (EOL) Timeline Across Major Platforms

While TLS 1.2 is still technically supported across many platforms, key industry players are setting firm timelines or preparing users for its eventual deprecation. Understanding these shifts helps organizations anticipate disruption and stay compliant.

Microsoft Azure and Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft has already deprecated TLS 1.0 and 1.1 across its cloud environments. While TLS 1.2 is still supported, Azure is gradually enforcing the use of stronger cipher suites and encouraging adoption of TLS 1.3. In Microsoft Entra instances operated by 21Vianet in China, the full phase-out of legacy protocols, including 3DES, will be completed by January 31, 2025.

• This marks the most concrete TLS 1.2 end of life Azure milestone to date.

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology)

The U.S. government’s cybersecurity authority hasn’t declared TLS 1.2 deprecated yet. However, in SP 800-52 Rev. 2, NIST mandates that only approved, strong cipher suites should be used with TLS 1.2. Weak or outdated cryptographic options under TLS 1.2 may no longer meet compliance standards.

• This puts organizations under pressure to either harden TLS 1.2 or move toward TLS 1.3, hinting at a potential TLS 1.2 end of life NIST notice in the future.

Google Chrome and Modern Browsers

The browser ecosystem has moved quickly. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge have all removed support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1. While TLS 1.2 is still functional, many browser vendors are now warning users and developers to expect future changes.

• As TLS 1.2 end of life Chrome inches closer, developers must ensure their sites and services are ready for TLS 1.3 by default.

Security Concerns and Vulnerabilities in TLS 1.2

At first glance, TLS 1.2 may seem secure. After all, it’s been the backbone of encrypted communication for years. But beneath the surface lie several concerns,, some of which have pushed security leaders to accelerate its retirement.

1. Cipher Suite Complexity

TLS 1.2 supports a wide variety of cipher suites, including outdated and vulnerable options like SHA-1, RC4, CBC-mode ciphers, and RSA key exchanges. The flexibility to choose among these has been both a strength and a weakness. Misconfigurations or legacy defaults can lead to the use of weak encryption, creating opportunities for downgrade attacks or cryptographic exploits.

2. Optional Forward Secrecy

Unlike TLS 1.3, where Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) is mandatory, TLS 1.2 only supports it optionally. Without PFS, if a private key is compromised, all past sessions encrypted with it can also be decrypted, a critical weakness in high-security environments.

3. Known Exploits

TLS 1.2 has been associated with various well-documented attacks, such as:

• POODLE (Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption) initially targeted SSL 3.0 but applicable to some TLS implementations.
  
• GOLDENDOODLE — a variant of POODLE exploiting CBC-mode ciphers.
  These vulnerabilities are usually tied to legacy cipher suites still allowed under TLS 1.2. This is why configuration matters; even TLS 1.2 can be unsafe if paired with outdated cryptographic methods.

4. Compliance Pressure

Modern compliance frameworks increasingly disallow or discourage insecure cipher combinations. Organizations that continue using TLS 1.2 in its default or poorly configured state may fail compliance audits, especially those tied to FedRAMP, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, or ISO 27001.

So, is TLS 1.2 secure? Only with strong configurations, and even then, it’s not future-proof. It remains a viable option today, but it’s no longer considered best-in-class security.

Visit tolumichael.com now to take your first step towards career transformation. Start earning multiple six figures with confidence. Don’t miss out!

The Rise of TLS 1.3: A Safer, Smarter Successor

With all the limitations and vulnerabilities exposed in TLS 1.2, the release of TLS 1.3 in 2018 marked a pivotal shift in secure communications. Designed from the ground up to address the weaknesses of previous versions, TLS 1.3 is faster, leaner, and significantly more secure.

1. Faster Handshakes

One of the most immediate benefits of TLS 1.3 is performance. It reduces the number of round trips required to establish a secure connection from two (in TLS 1.2) to just one. This improvement results in faster page loads, quicker logins, and more responsive apps, especially noticeable in mobile and low-bandwidth environments.

TLS 1.3 also supports Zero Round Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT), which allows clients to resume previous sessions instantly without a full handshake, further improving performance in repeat interactions.

2. Simplified and Stronger Cipher Suites

TLS 1.3 intentionally removes outdated and risky algorithms. Gone are RSA key exchanges, SHA-1, MD5, and other legacy mechanisms vulnerable to downgrade and side-channel attacks. Instead, TLS 1.3 uses a streamlined cipher suite list made up of modern, secure, and vetted options only, reducing the risk of misconfiguration.

3. Mandatory Forward Secrecy

TLS 1.3 enforces Perfect Forward Secrecy by default using ephemeral key exchanges like Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDHE). This means even if a server’s private key is compromised, past sessions remain safe, a major leap in confidentiality assurance.

4. Stronger Compliance and Broader Support

Security standards from organizations like NIST, NSA, and CISA already recommend adopting TLS 1.3 wherever possible. Major cloud providers, browsers, and CDN platforms (e.g., Cloudflare, AWS, Azure) have rolled out full TLS 1.3 support across their services.

The future is clear: TLS 1.3 is a security requirement not just an upgrade.

SEE ALSO: What Does a Cybersecurity Analyst Do in Cryptography​?

What Happens If You Still Use TLS 1.2?

Continuing to use TLS 1.2 might seem like a safe fallback, especially since it’s still technically supported. But doing so comes with growing risks that extend beyond security vulnerabilities.

1. Risk of Service Disruption

As major cloud providers like Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and AWS begin enforcing stricter cryptographic requirements, older systems that rely solely on TLS 1.2, particularly with legacy cipher suites, may suddenly stop working. This includes services like Microsoft Entra Connect, Graph PowerShell, and various identity connectors. If your environment doesn’t support TLS 1.2+ or TLS 1.3, you could experience failures in authentication, data exchange, or API calls.

2. Compliance Gaps

Using TLS 1.2 with weak or default configurations could violate compliance mandates. Whether it’s HIPAA, FedRAMP, PCI-DSS, or ISO 27001, many of these frameworks now require use of strong encryption only. That means TLS 1.2 is acceptable only if hardened — and even then, it may not pass future audits as standards evolve.

This aligns with what’s hinted in TLS 1.2 end of life NIST discussions, where deprecated cipher suites used under TLS 1.2 could disqualify an otherwise compliant system.

3. False Sense of Security

A system that “supports TLS 1.2” may still fallback silently to TLS 1.0 or 1.1 during poor network conditions unless explicitly configured otherwise. These silent fallbacks are often invisible to users but can expose data in transit, making them prime targets for downgrade attacks.

4. Limited Browser and Client Support

While TLS 1.2 end of life Chrome hasn’t been officially announced, many browser vendors are discouraging its use. Modern browsers may begin flagging TLS 1.2-only sites as “Not Fully Secure”, just as they did for TLS 1.0/1.1 before removal.

In short: using TLS 1.2 today is like driving a car that barely passes inspection. It still runs, but one policy update, OS patch, or browser change could leave you stranded.

Visit tolumichael.com now to take your first step towards career transformation. Start earning multiple six figures with confidence. Don’t miss out!

What You Should Do Now: TLS 1.2 Mitigation & Transition Plan

If your systems still rely on TLS 1.2, now is the time to strategically transition — not panic. The goal isn’t just to meet compliance requirements, but to proactively strengthen your organization’s cybersecurity posture. Here’s a clear plan to help you move forward.

1. Audit Your TLS Usage

Start by identifying all applications, clients, and services communicating over TLS. Use tools like:

• Microsoft Entra sign-in logs to flag legacy TLS connections
  
• Azure Monitor with KQL queries to trace TLS 1.0/1.1/1.2 traffic
  
• SSL Labs Handshake Simulation for browser and client compatibility testing

Focus especially on older clients: Android < 4.4, Internet Explorer ≤ 10, outdated Java applications, and embedded systems.

2. Harden TLS 1.2 Configurations

If you must continue using TLS 1.2 during your transition:

• Disable insecure ciphers (e.g., RC4, SHA-1, CBC-mode suites)
  
• Enforce Perfect Forward Secrecy by using ECDHE cipher suites
  
• Ensure .NET Framework and Windows Registry values are set to support TLS 1.2 with strong cryptography
  
• Avoid fallback to TLS 1.0 or 1.1 under any circumstances

This reduces exposure while keeping older systems temporarily operational.

3. Upgrade Infrastructure for TLS 1.3

Where possible, enable TLS 1.3 support across:

• Web servers (IIS, Apache, Nginx)
  
• Application frameworks
  
• Browsers and mobile apps
  
• Microsoft services like Entra Connect, MFA Server, NPS Extension, and Graph APIs

For Windows Server environments, ensure you’re using 2019 or later, with updated patches. For .NET apps, confirm support for TLS 1.3 and update to the latest .NET versions.

4. Communicate with Vendors and Stakeholders

Third-party integrations may not yet support TLS 1.3. Check with each vendor on their roadmap and coordinate upgrade timelines to avoid disruption.

5. Enforce and Monitor

Finally, use tools like Azure Policy, Group Policy, and PowerShell scripts to enforce TLS settings across your environment. Continue monitoring logs to ensure legacy TLS traffic is fully phased out.

MORE: How to Convert OpenSSH Private Key to RSA Private Key

Is TLS 1.2 Deprecated?

TLS 1.2 is not officially deprecated but it’s on its way out. TLS 1.2 is still widely supported, especially in enterprise environments, but the direction from leading platforms, regulators, and security experts is clear: move on.

• Microsoft Azure is enabling TLS 1.3 across its services and tightening enforcement of strong cipher use for TLS 1.2.
  
• NIST hasn’t yet marked TLS 1.2 as deprecated, but its guidelines suggest limited and cautious use.
  
• Chrome and major browsers still allow TLS 1.2 but are preparing for a TLS 1.3-first future.
  
• The known TLS 1.2 vulnerabilities, paired with inconsistent configuration practices, make it a security risk if not carefully managed.

Organizations can no longer afford to treat TLS 1.2 as a long-term solution. Whether you’re looking at it from a performance, compliance, or security standpoint, TLS 1.3 is the better, safer, and future-proof choice.

If your systems still rely on TLS 1.2, take action now. Audit your stack, upgrade your infrastructure, enforce strict security settings, and plan for a full transition. The sooner you adopt TLS 1.3, the more resilient and compliant your organization will be.

Conclusion

TLS 1.2 served the digital world well, but its time is running out. While it’s not fully deprecated yet, global trends across Microsoft Azure, Chrome, and NIST standards all point in one direction: upgrade or risk falling behind. 

The move to TLS 1.3 is more than just keeping up; it’s staying secure, staying compliant, and staying online. Don’t wait until support disappears or vulnerabilities strike. Migrate now, and ensure your systems are built for the next decade of secure communication.

FAQ