Zeek Vs Wireshark: A Complete Analysis

Network security is a fast-growing challenge as cyber threats become more sophisticated, and the volume of data exchanged across networks continues to rise.

Network traffic analysis tools play a critical role in ensuring that these threats are detected early and systems remain secure. Zeek and Wireshark are two of the most widely used tools in the cybersecurity field for network monitoring, while NetworkMiner is another notable tool that excels in forensic analysis.

In this article, we will compare Zeek vs Wireshark, and NetworkMiner, highlighting their features, use cases, strengths, and weaknesses. We’ll also explore how these tools differ from other popular network analysis tools, such as Suricata, and provide guidance on how to use NetworkMiner for network forensic investigations.

If you’re ready to take the next step in your tech career journey, cybersecurity is the simplest and high-paying field to start from. Apart from earning 6-figures from the comfort of your home, you don’t need to have a degree or IT background. Schedule a one-on-one consultation session with our expert cybersecurity coach, Tolulope Michael TODAY! Join over 1000 students in sharing your success stories.

*The 5-Day Cybersecurity Job Challenge with *the seasoned expert Tolulope Michael* is an opportunity for you to understand the most effective method of landing a six-figure cybersecurity job.*

Start a Life-Changing Career in Cybersecurity Today

Zeek Vs Wireshark: Comparison Table

Feature	Zeek	Wireshark	NetworkMiner	Suricata
Type of Tool	Network Security Monitoring	Packet Analyzer	Network Forensics & Traffic Sniffer	IDS/IPS (Intrusion Detection/Prevention)
Main Use Case	Network traffic monitoring, security analysis	Real-time packet capture and analysis	Forensic analysis, data extraction from traffic	Real-time threat detection and prevention
Real-time Monitoring	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Protocol Support	HTTP, DNS, SSL, FTP, etc.	HTTP, DNS, FTP, many others	TCP, HTTP, FTP, DNS, etc.	Various (Signature-based)
Traffic Analysis	Flow-based, protocol analysis	Packet-level analysis	File and data extraction from packets	Signature and anomaly-based detection
Logging	Extensive logging for long-term analysis	No logging, focuses on real-time capture	Basic logging and data extraction	Logs traffic and security events
Customizability	High (custom scripts and detection)	Limited (filtering and analysis)	Limited (focuses on extraction and forensics)	Moderate (supports rule sets and policies)
Ease of Use	Advanced, steep learning curve	User-friendly, with a GUI	Easy to use with GUI	Moderate (CLI, but some GUIs available)
Scalability	High, ideal for large networks	Limited for large networks	Suitable for small to medium networks	High, designed for high-performance monitoring
Installation	Complex, requires setup and configuration	Easy installation	Easy installation, but Windows only for sniffing	Easy to install, often integrated with other tools
Best For	Security operations, network monitoring, threat detection	Troubleshooting, protocol analysis, packet capture	Network forensics, post-event investigations	Real-time intrusion detection and prevention
Platform	Linux, Windows, macOS	Linux, Windows, macOS	Windows, Linux	Linux, Windows, macOS

Zeek Vs Wireshark: Comparison Table

Network Traffic Analyzers

This One Mistake Is Costing You Your Promotion

Network traffic analyzers are essential tools in the cybersecurity toolkit, helping professionals monitor, analyze, and secure network traffic. These tools capture data packets that flow through a network, providing valuable insights into how the network is performing and identifying potential security threats.

In the context of cybersecurity, network traffic analysis tools are primarily used for three purposes:

Troubleshooting network performance issues: Identifying bottlenecks or disruptions in service.
Monitoring network security: Detecting malicious activity or unauthorized access attempts.
Forensic analysis: Investigating past network traffic to identify how a breach or incident occurred.

These tools are commonly used by network administrators, security analysts, and forensic investigators to ensure network integrity and to safeguard sensitive data. They are crucial for detecting anything from simple network slowdowns to complex cyberattacks like Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, data exfiltration, and malware campaigns.

Key players in the network traffic analysis space include Zeek, Wireshark, and NetworkMiner. While they serve similar purposes, they differ significantly in their features and best-use scenarios, which makes it important to choose the right tool for the task at hand.

Zeek (Formerly Bro)

Zeek, formerly known as Bro, is a robust and powerful open-source network security monitoring tool designed to analyze network traffic in real time. Unlike traditional packet analyzers, Zeek is primarily focused on network security, making it an excellent choice for security operations centers (SOCs) and large-scale networks.

What is Zeek?

Zeek is a passive network monitoring tool that examines network traffic for security incidents. It does not interfere with the network itself but instead collects data for further analysis. Zeek excels in monitoring network flows and protocols, providing comprehensive logs that help identify anomalies, malware, and other security threats.

Key Features of Zeek

Real-time Network Analysis: Zeek offers powerful real-time analysis capabilities, allowing network administrators to monitor and respond to network activity instantly.
Protocol Analysis: Zeek is capable of analyzing a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, FTP, DNS, and SSL, providing deep insights into network traffic.
Customizable Scripting Language: One of Zeek’s key features is its scripting language, which allows users to write custom scripts for traffic analysis, detection, and automation of network monitoring tasks.
Comprehensive Logging: Zeek generates detailed logs for network events, which can be used for long-term analysis, forensic investigations, and identifying security breaches.
Scalability: Zeek is designed for scalability, making it suitable for large enterprise environments with heavy network traffic.

Advantages of Zeek

High Scalability: Zeek can handle the analysis of large volumes of network data efficiently, making it ideal for big networks.
Extensive Customization: The scripting language and extensibility options provide users the ability to tailor Zeek to meet specific network security needs.
Advanced Threat Detection: Zeek’s ability to detect suspicious patterns and anomalies in network traffic makes it a powerful tool for proactive threat hunting.

Challenges of Using Zeek

Steep Learning Curve: The customization and extensive features of Zeek come with a steep learning curve, making it more difficult for beginners to master.
Configuration Complexity: Setting up Zeek and writing custom scripts can be time-consuming and requires a good understanding of network protocols.

Zeek is particularly beneficial for advanced users who require in-depth network analysis and want to build custom detection rules. It’s most effective in environments where traffic monitoring and incident response need to be automated and scalable.

Visit tolumichael.com now to take your first step towards career transformation. Start earning multiple six figures with confidence. Don’t miss out!

Wireshark

*Active Directory Security Best Practices*

Wireshark is one of the most popular and widely used network traffic analysis tools, particularly favored by network administrators and cybersecurity professionals for its simplicity and versatility. As an open-source packet analyzer, Wireshark allows users to capture and inspect the data traveling through a network, providing in-depth visibility into network communications.

What is Wireshark?

Wireshark is a real-time network packet capture tool that displays data traffic in a readable format, helping users understand how data flows across a network. While Wireshark doesn’t focus on real-time threat detection, it excels in troubleshooting network issues, analyzing protocols, and understanding network behavior.

Key Features of Wireshark

Packet Capture (PCAP): Wireshark captures network packets and decodes them for easy analysis, allowing users to examine the details of each packet.
Real-time Analysis: Users can view live network traffic as it is captured, which makes Wireshark an excellent tool for monitoring ongoing network activities.
Extensive Protocol Support: Wireshark supports hundreds of network protocols, making it a versatile tool for various network environments.
Filtering Options: Wireshark allows users to apply custom filters to focus on specific types of network traffic, making it easier to pinpoint issues or suspicious activity.
Graphical User Interface (GUI): Wireshark’s GUI makes it accessible to both beginners and experts, with a simple yet detailed view of network data.

Advantages of Wireshark

Ease of Use: The GUI makes Wireshark very user-friendly, even for those new to network traffic analysis.
In-Depth Protocol Analysis: Wireshark can dissect and display the data and protocols that are being exchanged between networked devices in real time.
Widespread Community Support: As one of the most popular network analyzers, Wireshark has a large community that provides resources, tutorials, and troubleshooting advice.

Challenges of Using Wireshark

Requires Elevated Privileges: To capture live network traffic, Wireshark requires administrative or root access on the device, which can be a security risk in some environments.
Security Vulnerabilities: Wireshark itself can be a security concern, as it can be used to eavesdrop on sensitive data and be exploited as part of a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
Limited Real-Time Intrusion Detection: While Wireshark is great for analysis, it is not designed to act as an intrusion detection system (IDS), which limits its use for proactive network defense.

Wireshark is ideal for professionals looking to troubleshoot specific network issues, perform protocol analysis, or gather packet-level data for a deeper understanding of network traffic. It’s less focused on proactive security and more on detailed packet inspection.

NetworkMiner

*GQUIC Protocol Analysis and Fingerprinting in Zeek*

NetworkMiner is another open-source tool designed primarily for network forensics and passive traffic sniffing. Unlike Zeek and Wireshark, which focus on capturing and analyzing packets in real time, NetworkMiner specializes in extracting data and files from captured network traffic, making it a valuable tool for cybersecurity investigations and post-event analysis.

What is NetworkMiner?

NetworkMiner is a forensic analysis tool used to collect and parse data from network traffic. It allows users to extract files, images, and other artifacts from captured packets, which can then be used for deeper analysis. NetworkMiner is known for its ability to reconstruct sessions and provide a detailed view of network activity, including identifying hosts, open ports, and operating systems.

Key Features of NetworkMiner

File and Data Extraction: NetworkMiner can extract files, images, emails, and other types of data from network traffic, which is useful for analyzing specific incidents or gathering evidence.
Host Identification and OS Fingerprinting: NetworkMiner can identify devices and determine the operating systems in use, which is valuable in network forensics.
Geolocation Information: It provides geolocation data for IP addresses, helping analysts understand the physical location of devices within the network.
Graphical User Interface (GUI): NetworkMiner’s GUI makes it simple to navigate through and analyze network traffic, with a focus on visual representation of data.

NetworkMiner vs Zeek

NetworkMiner is more focused on forensic analysis and data extraction, while Zeek is designed for real-time monitoring and network security.

Zeek can analyze and log network traffic, providing insights into potential security threats, whereas NetworkMiner is typically used after an incident occurs to investigate the traffic and extract data that can help with understanding the attack.

NetworkMiner in Kali Linux

NetworkMiner can be used effectively in Kali Linux, a popular penetration testing distribution, for passive traffic sniffing and forensic analysis. Kali users can take advantage of NetworkMiner’s capabilities to examine network traffic and extract useful information, such as files and credentials, during a penetration test or security assessment.

NetworkMiner Download and Installation

NetworkMiner is available for download on its official website. It can be installed on both Windows and Linux platforms. While the free version offers many features, a paid version unlocks additional advanced capabilities for professional users.

Windows: Simply download the installer from the NetworkMiner website, and follow the installation prompts.
Linux: For Kali Linux users, NetworkMiner can be installed directly from the package manager or via source code.

What is NetworkMiner Used For?

NetworkMiner is primarily used for network forensics, allowing professionals to capture and analyze traffic after a security incident. It’s especially useful for extracting files, analyzing host data, and identifying unauthorized access. It’s commonly used in:

Cybersecurity Investigations: For uncovering malicious activity and extracting key data from network traffic.
Penetration Testing: As part of a larger security assessment to gather evidence and monitor network traffic.

How to Use NetworkMiner

Step 1: Capture Network Traffic: First, you’ll need to capture network traffic using a tool like tcpdump or Wireshark.
Step 2: Load the Capture in NetworkMiner: Once you have your capture files, load them into NetworkMiner.
Step 3: Analyze the Traffic: Use the graphical interface to explore the captured data. Look for files, images, and other content that NetworkMiner has extracted.
Step 4: Investigate Hosts and OS Fingerprints: Identify the devices on the network and analyze the OS and services in use.

NetworkMiner is particularly useful when you need to extract detailed data from network traffic and identify potential security incidents after they have occurred.

Visit tolumichael.com now to take your first step towards career transformation. Start earning multiple six figures with confidence. Don’t miss out!

Zeek vs Wireshark vs NetworkMiner

*How Stratoshark Brings the Power of Wireshark to the Cloud*

Now that we’ve explored the individual features and capabilities of Zeek, Wireshark, and NetworkMiner, it’s time to compare these tools side by side.

Each tool has unique strengths that make it ideal for different scenarios in network analysis, security monitoring, and forensic investigations. Understanding these differences will help you choose the right tool for your specific needs.

Feature Comparison

Zeek: Zeek is best suited for large-scale network security monitoring. It provides deep protocol analysis and real-time detection of anomalies and threats. With its powerful scripting language, Zeek can be highly customized for specific network environments, making it suitable for advanced users in security operations centers (SOCs).
- Best for: Real-time traffic analysis, threat detection, and network monitoring at scale.
- Strengths: Scalability, protocol analysis, customizable detection capabilities, encrypted traffic analysis.
- Weaknesses: Steep learning curve, complex configuration.
Wireshark: Wireshark excels in capturing and analyzing individual network packets. It is widely used for troubleshooting network issues, analyzing protocol behavior, and understanding the flow of traffic in detail. However, it is not primarily designed for proactive security detection and is more suited to network diagnostics.
- Best for: Troubleshooting network issues, in-depth protocol analysis, packet-level inspections.
- Strengths: User-friendly interface, extensive protocol support, real-time packet capture.
- Weaknesses: Requires elevated privileges for packet capture, potential security concerns, no real-time threat detection.
NetworkMiner: NetworkMiner is tailored for network forensics, making it an excellent tool for investigating past network events. It specializes in extracting files, images, and other data from captured traffic, and it provides detailed insights into network behavior, including identifying hosts and operating systems.
- Best for: Forensic analysis, data extraction, post-event investigations.
- Strengths: Data extraction, host identification, easy-to-use GUI.
- Weaknesses: Primarily a passive tool, not designed for real-time monitoring or active intrusion detection.

MORE: What Is NIDS in Cyber Security? It’s Relationship with HIDS

Best Use Cases for Each Tool

Zeek: Use Zeek for comprehensive network monitoring in large or complex network environments, especially where there is a need for customized security detection and scalability. Zeek is ideal for security professionals who need to monitor network traffic for signs of malicious activity, detect anomalies, and implement automated incident response.
Wireshark: Use Wireshark when you need to troubleshoot network issues, analyze the behavior of specific network protocols, or conduct detailed packet-level analysis. It is invaluable in understanding the minutiae of network traffic and diagnosing performance or security issues.
NetworkMiner: NetworkMiner is best used in situations where you need to conduct a forensic investigation, analyze network traffic after an incident, or extract data from captured packets. It’s an excellent tool for gathering evidence, analyzing malware infections, or auditing network traffic for suspicious activity.

Which Tool to Use in Different Scenarios?

For Real-Time Monitoring and Threat Detection: Zeek is the best choice. It provides ongoing analysis of network traffic, logs events for later review, and helps security teams proactively detect potential threats.
For Network Troubleshooting: Wireshark is your go-to tool. It is designed for packet-level analysis and allows you to pinpoint the root causes of network issues, whether they be configuration errors or performance bottlenecks.
For Post-Incident Forensics: If you’re investigating an incident or analyzing network traffic after an event, NetworkMiner provides powerful data extraction capabilities, helping you recover files, identify hosts, and uncover hidden information.

Zeek vs Suricata

While Zeek is an excellent tool for passive network monitoring and analysis, Suricata is another popular network security tool that focuses on intrusion detection and prevention. Both tools are open-source, but they differ in their core functionalities, architectures, and use cases.

What is Suricata?

Suricata is a high-performance IDS/IPS (Intrusion Detection/Prevention System) that provides network threat detection and monitoring. Unlike Zeek, which is primarily focused on traffic analysis and logging, Suricata is designed to detect malicious activity and block it in real-time.

It uses a combination of signature-based detection, anomaly detection, and flow-based monitoring to identify threats and enforce security policies.

READ: Fluentd vs Telegraf: Choosing the Right Log Aggregation Tool

Zeek vs Suricata: Key Differences

Focus:
- Zeek is focused on network monitoring, traffic analysis, and generating detailed logs that can be analyzed for security events. It excels at detecting long-term anomalies and providing forensic data.
- Suricata is an IDS/IPS tool that focuses on real-time threat detection and prevention. It analyzes network traffic for known attack patterns using signature-based methods and can take proactive actions to block threats.
Detection Mechanism:
- Zeek uses flow-based monitoring, where it inspects network traffic to build an understanding of overall network behavior. Zeek’s strength lies in its ability to create custom detection rules through scripting, allowing for flexible and targeted monitoring.
- Suricata uses signature-based detection, which means it compares network traffic against predefined attack signatures. Suricata also supports anomaly-based detection and provides intrusion prevention capabilities, which allows it to block detected threats in real-time.
Performance and Scalability:
- Zeek is highly scalable, making it suitable for large environments. Its ability to generate detailed logs allows for in-depth post-event analysis.
- Suricata is optimized for high-performance, real-time analysis, and intrusion prevention. It is well-suited for environments where real-time threat detection is critical.

When to Use Suricata Instead of Zeek?

Suricata is the better choice if your primary goal is real-time threat detection and prevention. If you’re dealing with an environment that requires proactive blocking of threats, Suricata’s IDS/IPS features make it more suitable than Zeek. Suricata is also ideal for environments where signature-based detection of known attacks is necessary.

However, if you need to monitor traffic for detailed analysis, long-term event logging, or custom detection capabilities, Zeek would be more appropriate. In many cases, both tools can be used together to complement each other—Suricata for real-time detection and Zeek for detailed traffic analysis and logging.

Conclusion

In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, having the right network traffic analysis tools is essential for maintaining network security and performance. Zeek, Wireshark, and NetworkMiner each offer unique features and serve different purposes in the field of network monitoring and analysis.

Zeek is ideal for large-scale network monitoring and in-depth traffic analysis, making it a powerful tool for security professionals who require detailed logs, custom detection rules, and scalability.

Wireshark, with its easy-to-use interface and real-time packet analysis capabilities, excels in network troubleshooting and protocol analysis. However, it is less suitable for proactive security detection and more focused on diagnosing network issues.
NetworkMiner specializes in network forensics, making it perfect for post-incident investigations where the goal is to extract data, reconstruct sessions, and identify hosts and vulnerabilities within network traffic.

There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Depending on your network’s needs, whether you’re focused on real-time threat detection, packet-level analysis, or post-event forensics, you may find that combining these tools gives you the most comprehensive view of your network’s health and security.

Additionally, when comparing Zeek vs Suricata, it’s clear that these tools can complement each other. Zeek is best for detailed traffic monitoring, while Suricata’s real-time detection and prevention capabilities make it a go-to choice for blocking threats as they occur.

Choosing the right tool (or combination of tools) depends on your organization’s specific network environment and security requirements. Whether you’re looking for detailed packet-level analysis, real-time detection, or forensic capabilities, the tools discussed here provide the foundation for building a robust network security posture.

FAQ

Is there something better than Wireshark?

While Wireshark is one of the most widely used and versatile packet analyzers, it may not be the best tool for all use cases. For example, tools like Zeek and Suricata offer more specialized features for network monitoring and intrusion detection that Wireshark doesn’t focus on.

Zeek excels in network security monitoring and customizable detection, while Suricata is better suited for real-time threat detection and prevention. Additionally, tcpdump is a lightweight alternative for capturing network traffic when a more straightforward packet analysis tool is needed.

Why do we use Zeek?

Zeek is used primarily for network security monitoring. It helps security professionals analyze network traffic for anomalies, malicious activities, and protocol violations. Zeek’s real-time monitoring and extensive logging capabilities make it ideal for detecting complex security threats that require deeper network visibility.

Additionally, Zeek offers high scalability and the ability to create custom detection scripts, allowing users to tailor it to their specific network environments. It is especially useful for threat hunting, incident response, and long-term forensic analysis.

Do cybersecurity analysts use Wireshark?

Cybersecurity analysts frequently use Wireshark for tasks such as network troubleshooting, protocol analysis, and incident investigation. Wireshark’s ability to capture and analyze network packets provides invaluable insights into the flow of data across networks.

It’s especially useful when investigating security incidents, as it allows analysts to examine network traffic in real-time or analyze captured data for signs of malicious activity. However, for proactive threat detection, cybersecurity analysts might pair Wireshark with other tools like Zeek or Suricata.

Which is better, Wireshark or tcpdump?

Both Wireshark and tcpdump are used for packet capturing, but they serve slightly different purposes:
Wireshark is a graphical tool that offers detailed packet analysis, real-time monitoring, and advanced filtering capabilities. It’s more user-friendly, especially for those who prefer to view and analyze network data visually.

tcpdump is a command-line tool that captures and displays network traffic in a text-based format. It is lighter, faster, and preferred for quick, on-the-go packet capture in environments where a graphical interface isn’t needed.
Which is better depends on the context:
Wireshark is generally better for detailed analysis and user-friendliness.

tcpdump is better for simple packet capture or when working in environments with limited resources.
Both tools complement each other and can be used together depending on the situation.

Zeek Vs Wireshark: A Complete Analysis

Zeek Vs Wireshark: Comparison Table

Network Traffic Analyzers