Snort vs Suricata vs Zeek: Which Open-Source IDS is Best for 2025?

Cyber threats are becoming more sophisticated, making intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) critical for organizations looking to secure their networks. 

Among open-source IDS solutions, three tools stand out as leading contenders: Snort, Suricata, and Zeek. Each offers a unique approach to detecting and analyzing malicious activity, making them valuable assets in different security scenarios.

Snort is a signature-based IDS that excels at detecting known attack patterns, while Suricata builds on Snort’s foundation with multi-threading and deep packet inspection for improved performance. Zeek, on the other hand, takes a different approach by focusing on network traffic analysis, offering unparalleled visibility into network behavior.

This article will compare Snort vs Suricata vs Zeek in 2025, helping security teams determine which tool best fits their needs. We’ll explore their strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases, including pfSense Zeek deployments, Suricata rules optimization, and hybrid security strategies. 

Whether you’re looking for real-time threat detection, deep forensic analysis, or both, understanding the differences between these tools will help you make an informed decision.

RELATED: What Does a Cybersecurity Analyst Do in Cryptography​?

Snort vs Suricata vs Zeek: Comparison Table

Choosing between Snort, Suricata, and Zeek depends on the specific security needs of an organization. Each tool has distinct strengths, making them suitable for different use cases. Below is a comparative analysis of their core features and functionalities.

Snort vs Suricata vs Zeek: Key Differences

Feature	Snort	Suricata	Zeek
Detection Approach	Signature-based	Signature + anomaly-based	Network traffic analysis
Processing Architecture	Single-threaded	Multi-threaded	Multi-process
Use Case	Real-time IDS/IPS	Real-time IDS/IPS + NSM	Forensic investigation, threat hunting
Deep Packet Inspection	Limited	Advanced DPI	Logs metadata, not packet payloads
Protocol Analysis	Basic	Advanced (HTTP, TLS, DNS, etc.)	Extensive metadata collection
Real-Time Threat Blocking	Yes	Yes	No (passive monitoring)
Performance	Slower, CPU-intensive	High-performance	High-storage requirement
Customization	Rule-based	Rule-based + Protocol detection	Scripting-based
Learning Curve	Beginner-friendly	Moderate	Steep (requires scripting)
Integration	pfSense, SIEM	SIEM, ELK Stack	SIEM, ELK Stack, Threat Hunting Platforms

What Are Open-Source IDS Systems?

An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) is a security tool that monitors network traffic for suspicious activity and potential cyber threats. Unlike a firewall, which primarily controls access to a network, an IDS is designed to detect and alert security teams about potential intrusions. Some IDS solutions also function as Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS), actively blocking threats in real-time.

Open-source IDS tools have gained popularity due to their cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and transparency. Unlike proprietary security solutions, open-source IDS allows security teams to customize detection rules, integrate with other security tools, and benefit from community-driven improvements.

When choosing which open-source IDS; Snort, Suricata, or Zeek; is best, it’s important to consider their fundamental differences. Snort and Suricata rely on signature-based detection, comparing traffic against known attack patterns, while Zeek focuses on network traffic logging and behavioral analysis rather than real-time blocking.

Each tool serves a distinct purpose:

• Snort is widely used for traditional IDS/IPS setups, particularly in pfSense environments.
• Suricata builds on Snort’s capabilities with multi-threaded processing and deep packet inspection.
• Zeek provides detailed network metadata and forensic insights, making it ideal for threat hunting and anomaly detection.

READ MORE: OSSEC Vs Suricata: A Complete Analysis

Snort: The Legacy of Signature-Based Detection

Snort is one of the most widely used open-source intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS). Developed by Martin Roesch in 1998, Snort has remained a cornerstone of network security due to its reliable signature-based detection system and large community-driven rule sets.

How Snort Works

Snort operates by analyzing network traffic in real time and comparing it against a library of predefined attack signatures. If a packet matches a known attack pattern, Snort generates an alert or takes action (if running in IPS mode). The tool uses Snort rules, a flexible rule-based language that allows security teams to define custom threat detection parameters.

Key Features of Snort

• Signature-Based Detection: Matches traffic against a vast database of known threats.
• Lightweight and Efficient: Works well even on low-resource systems.
• Strong Community Support: Security researchers regularly update and contribute to Snort’s rule sets.
• pfSense Integration: Frequently deployed in pfSense firewalls for network intrusion detection.

Limitations of Snort

While Snort is effective at detecting known threats, it has some drawbacks:

• Single-threaded processing makes it less efficient for high-traffic environments.
• Limited anomaly detection—Snort struggles to detect novel or zero-day attacks.
• Manual rule updates required to keep up with evolving threats.

Snort vs Suricata: Performance and Detection

When comparing Snort vs Suricata, Suricata improves on Snort’s limitations by introducing multi-threaded processing and protocol-based anomaly detection. While Snort remains a solid choice for smaller networks and legacy environments, Suricata is often preferred for high-bandwidth enterprises due to its ability to process traffic more efficiently.

Snort continues to be a reliable IDS, particularly for organizations that require signature-based detection with minimal resource usage. However, for environments needing better performance and deeper packet inspection, Suricata is often the better choice.

SEE ALSO: OPNsense Zenarmor Vs Suricata: A Comprehensive Review

Suricata: Multi-Threaded Performance and Advanced Security

Suricata is a powerful open-source IDS/IPS developed by the Open Information Security Foundation (OISF). Designed to be a next-generation alternative to Snort, Suricata introduces multi-threading, deep packet inspection (DPI), and protocol-based anomaly detection, making it an excellent choice for high-performance network security environments.

How Suricata Works

Suricata functions similarly to Snort by using signature-based detection but enhances performance through multi-threaded processing. This means Suricata can utilize multiple CPU cores simultaneously, making it significantly more efficient in high-bandwidth networks.

Suricata also includes advanced protocol analysis, allowing it to inspect traffic at deeper layers, including HTTP, TLS, DNS, and FTP. This enables real-time threat detection, even within encrypted traffic.

Key Features of Suricata

• Multi-Threaded Processing: Uses all available CPU cores, improving scalability.
• Deep Packet Inspection (DPI): Analyzes packet payloads for hidden threats.
• Protocol-Based Anomaly Detection: Detects unusual behaviors within network protocols.
• Suricata Rules: Fully compatible with Snort rule sets, making migration easy.
• Flexible Deployment: Can operate as an IDS (passive monitoring), IPS (active blocking), or NSM (network security monitoring).

Suricata vs Snort: Why Suricata Is More Efficient

The Snort vs Suricata debate often centers on performance. Unlike Snort’s single-threaded architecture, Suricata distributes traffic analysis across multiple threads, ensuring better efficiency in high-traffic environments. Organizations handling large-scale networks or requiring real-time intrusion prevention will find Suricata to be the superior choice.

Challenges of Suricata

Despite its strengths, Suricata has some challenges:

• Higher Resource Usage: Multi-threading demands more processing power.
• Rule Tuning Required: Suricata rules need frequent updates to minimize false positives.
• Steeper Learning Curve: More complex than Snort due to advanced traffic inspection features.

Zeek vs Suricata: Different Security Approaches

When comparing Zeek vs Suricata, the difference lies in detection vs. analysis. Suricata actively detects and blocks threats in real time, while Zeek logs and analyzes network activity for forensic investigation. 

Organizations that require instant threat mitigation will benefit more from Suricata, while those needing deep network visibility should consider Zeek Suricata integration for full-spectrum security coverage.

Suricata’s versatility as an IDS, IPS, and NSM tool makes it an essential choice for enterprise security teams looking to enhance network visibility, prevent attacks, and optimize performance.

MORE: Zeek Vs Suricata: Everything About the Open-Source Tools

Zeek: Beyond Detection – A Network Traffic Analyzer

Zeek, formerly known as Bro, is fundamentally different from traditional Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) like Snort and Suricata. Instead of focusing on real-time threat detection and blocking, Zeek operates as a network traffic analyzer, capturing detailed logs and metadata for forensic analysis, anomaly detection, and long-term security monitoring.

How Zeek Works

Unlike Snort and Suricata, which rely on signature-based detection, Zeek takes a behavioral approach by passively monitoring network traffic and recording extensive details about network activity. Instead of triggering alerts based on predefined rules, Zeek allows security teams to analyze traffic patterns, detect anomalies, and reconstruct network events.

Key Features of Zeek

• Deep Traffic Analysis: Captures metadata on network communications, including HTTP requests, DNS lookups, SSL certificates, and more.
• Custom Scripting: Uses Zeek’s powerful scripting language for defining detection and analysis logic.
• Network Forensics: Provides detailed logs that help reconstruct incidents after they occur.
• Anomaly Detection: Identifies suspicious behavior based on deviations from normal network activity.
• Seamless Integration: Works well with SIEM tools, ELK Stack, and security platforms.

Zeek vs Snort: A Different Security Philosophy

Comparing Zeek vs Snort, the key difference is that Snort focuses on immediate threat detection, while Zeek prioritizes long-term network visibility and forensic investigation. Snort’s signature-based system makes it effective for catching known threats, but it lacks the depth of analysis that Zeek provides.

Organizations that need real-time intrusion detection should use Snort, while those requiring network behavior monitoring, anomaly detection, and forensic insights will benefit from Zeek.

Zeek vs Suricata: When to Choose Zeek

The Zeek vs Suricata comparison depends on whether you need real-time prevention or deep analysis. Suricata actively blocks threats and prevents attacks, making it ideal for immediate protection. Zeek, on the other hand, provides long-term insights, helping security teams understand how threats evolve over time.

Many organizations deploy a hybrid Zeek Suricata approach, where Suricata handles real-time detection and Zeek captures detailed traffic logs for forensic investigations.

Challenges of Zeek

• Steep Learning Curve: Requires knowledge of Zeek’s scripting language for full customization.
• No Real-Time Blocking: Unlike Suricata and Snort, Zeek does not actively prevent attacks.
• Higher Storage Requirements: Generates extensive logs that require effective data management.

pfSense Zeek: Deploying Zeek in Firewall Environments

Zeek can be integrated with pfSense to enhance network monitoring capabilities. pfSense Zeek setups allow organizations to gain deep visibility into network traffic while complementing existing IDS/IPS solutions. 

By combining pfSense firewall rules with Zeek’s traffic analysis, security teams can identify trends, investigate incidents, and improve network security posture.

Zeek’s ability to log and analyze network behavior makes it an essential tool for security analysts looking to detect hidden threats, analyze network anomalies, and strengthen overall cybersecurity.

Snort vs Suricata: Which is More Effective?

• Snort is suitable for smaller networks and legacy systems that rely on signature-based threat detection.
• Suricata is a better choice for high-traffic environments, thanks to its multi-threading and deep packet inspection (DPI).
• Suricata rules allow for protocol-based detection, making it more effective at catching zero-day threats compared to Snort.

Zeek vs Suricata: Complementary or Alternative?

• Zeek does not replace an IDS but enhances security by providing detailed network visibility and forensic data.
• Suricata actively blocks threats, while Zeek logs network activity for analysis.
• Many organizations deploy a Zeek Suricata hybrid setup, using Suricata for real-time intrusion prevention and Zeek for detailed network monitoring.

Zeek vs Snort: Which One to Choose?

• Snort is ideal for signature-based real-time detection, whereas Zeek is best for long-term network analysis.
• Organizations needing immediate alerts and active blocking will prefer Snort, while those focused on threat hunting and forensic investigations should use Zeek.

Final Verdict: Which Open-Source IDS – Snort, Suricata, or Zeek?

• Use Snort if you need a lightweight, rule-based IDS that integrates well with pfSense.
• Use Suricata if you require multi-threaded processing, DPI, and real-time threat prevention.
• Use Zeek if you need detailed network analysis, forensic capabilities, and anomaly detection.
• For full security coverage, combining Suricata and Zeek provides the best of real-time blocking and forensic insight.

READ: Apache Commons Text Vulnerability: What You Should Know

Choosing the Right IDS for Your Needs

Selecting the best open-source IDS—Snort, Suricata, or Zeek—depends on the specific security priorities of an organization. Each tool excels in different areas, and the right choice depends on factors such as network size, performance requirements, threat landscape, and security goals.

Use Snort If:

• Your priority is real-time detection of known threats.
• You need a lightweight IDS/IPS with strong community support.
• You are deploying an IDS on pfSense or a similar firewall system.
• Your organization has limited processing power and needs a simple signature-based detection system.

Use Suricata If:

• You require multi-threaded performance for high-traffic environments.
• Your organization needs both signature-based and anomaly-based detection.
• You want deeper packet inspection (DPI) for analyzing encrypted traffic.
• You need an IDS that can also function as an IPS and network security monitoring (NSM) tool.

Use Zeek If:

• Your security team focuses on forensic analysis and threat hunting.
• You need detailed network logs rather than immediate threat blocking.
• You want to analyze long-term network behavior to detect anomalies.
• You are integrating SIEM tools like the ELK Stack to correlate security events.

When to Use a Hybrid Approach

Many organizations find that a combination of Suricata and Zeek provides comprehensive security coverage:

• Suricata handles real-time detection and blocking to prevent attacks.
• Zeek records network traffic for forensic investigation, enabling security teams to analyze trends and anomalies over time.

A pfSense Zeek Suricata setup, for example, could use Suricata for immediate intrusion prevention while Zeek logs all network activity for later analysis.

ALSO SEE: Google Dork SQL Injection: A Comprehensive Analysis

pfSense Zeek and IDS Deployment Best Practices

Deploying an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) or Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) effectively requires careful planning to ensure optimal security coverage. Many organizations integrate IDS tools with pfSense, a widely used open-source firewall, to enhance network security. pfSense Zeek and pfSense Suricata setups provide powerful monitoring and threat detection capabilities.

pfSense Zeek: Enhancing Network Visibility

Zeek can be deployed on pfSense to provide deep network traffic analysis without actively blocking traffic. A pfSense Zeek setup allows organizations to:
✔ Capture detailed network logs for forensic investigations.
✔ Monitor protocol behavior across HTTP, DNS, TLS, and FTP.
✔ Detect anomalies and unusual communication patterns over time.
✔ Integrate with SIEM solutions to correlate data with other security tools.

pfSense Suricata: Real-Time Intrusion Prevention

Suricata is commonly deployed with pfSense as an IPS to actively block threats. A pfSense Suricata setup:
✔ Detects and blocks malicious traffic in real time.
✔ Uses Suricata rules to identify known attack patterns.
✔ Supports deep packet inspection (DPI) for encrypted traffic.
✔ Provides performance scalability with multi-threaded processing.

Best Practices for IDS Deployment

To maximize the effectiveness of Snort, Suricata, or Zeek, follow these best practices:

1. Customize IDS Rules for Your Environment

• Suricata rules and Snort rules should be tailored to your organization’s specific threat landscape to minimize false positives.
• Zeek scripts should be configured to focus on relevant network events to prevent unnecessary log storage.

2. Optimize Performance for High-Traffic Networks

• Use Suricata instead of Snort in large-scale networks to benefit from multi-threaded processing.
• Offload Zeek logs to an external SIEM system to avoid overwhelming local storage.

3. Integrate with SIEM and Threat Intelligence Feeds

• Forward Suricata and Zeek logs to SIEM tools like ELK Stack, Splunk, or Wazuh for centralized analysis.
• Use threat intelligence feeds to enhance IDS detection capabilities.

4. Regularly Update Suricata and Snort Rules

• Security threats evolve rapidly, so keeping rule sets updated ensures effective detection of new attacks.
• Automate rule updates using Emerging Threats (ET) rulesets for Suricata and Snort.

5. Use a Hybrid Approach for Full Security Coverage

• Suricata for real-time blocking, Zeek for forensic analysis.
• Deploy pfSense Suricata as an active IPS while Zeek monitors network activity passively.

Conclusion

When it comes to open-source intrusion detection and prevention systems, choosing the right tool depends on your security goals, network size, and detection requirements. Each IDS solution; Snort, Suricata, and Zeek; offers unique capabilities that cater to different cybersecurity needs.

Snort is a lightweight IDS/IPS that is easy to deploy and well-suited for signature-based threat detection, making it a great option for pfSense firewall integration. However, it struggles with high-traffic environments due to its single-threaded architecture.

Suricata improves on Snort by introducing multi-threaded processing, deep packet inspection (DPI), and protocol-based anomaly detection. It is ideal for organizations needing real-time threat detection and prevention with better scalability. Suricata rules allow for more advanced threat detection, making it a powerful alternative.

Zeek (formerly Bro) takes a different approach by focusing on network traffic analysis rather than active threat blocking. It is an excellent tool for forensic investigations, anomaly detection, and long-term security monitoring. pfSense Zeek setups provide deep visibility into network behavior, helping security teams uncover hidden threats.

Which Open-Source IDS—Snort, Suricata, or Zeek—Should You Choose?

The best solution often involves a hybrid deployment where Suricata actively detects and blocks threats, while Zeek logs and analyzes traffic for forensic insights. Organizations looking for a high-performance, cost-effective, and scalable security solution will benefit from integrating both tools.

As cyber threats continue to increase in 2025 and beyond, leveraging the right combination of Snort, Suricata, and Zeek will be essential in building a robust intrusion detection and prevention strategy.

FAQ

Feature	Snort	Suricata
Processing	Single-threaded (slower)	Multi-threaded (faster)
Threat Detection	Signature-based only	Signature + anomaly-based
Performance	Limited in high-traffic environments	Optimized for high-bandwidth networks
Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)	Basic	Advanced
Rule Compatibility	Uses Snort rules	Uses Snort rules + Suricata rules
Best For	Small networks, pfSense	High-performance, enterprise security

Suricata outperforms Snort in terms of speed, detection accuracy, and scalability. If you are deciding between the two, Suricata is the better choice for modern security needs.

Feature	Snort	Zeek
Detection Type	Signature-based IDS/IPS	Behavioral network analysis
Threat Response	Real-time blocking (IPS)	Passive logging (no blocking)
Performance	Limited in high-traffic environments	Scalable with multi-process architecture
Best Use Case	Immediate threat detection	Forensic investigations, anomaly detection

• Choose Snort if you need real-time alerts and blocking.
• Choose Zeek if you need deep network analysis and visibility.

If you’re ready to take the next step in your cybersecurity journey? You can do that with an expert beside you to guide you through without having to stress much. Schedule a one-on-one consultation with Tolulope Michael, a cybersecurity professional with over a decade of field experience. This will allow you to gain personalized insights and guidance tailored to your career goals.

Visit tolumichael.com now to book your session. This is your opportunity to embark on your cybersecurity career with confidence. Don’t miss out!